Thursday, June 14, 2007

John Kerry is a blogger.

Senator Kerry has now blogged at Daily Kos so many times, I feel compelled to add him to the wljk blogroll.

And yes, I am actually aware that, compared to being elected to the US Senate, accepting the nomination of the Democratic Party for President of the United States, getting three Purple Hearts and becoming a parent twice over, a spot on the wljk blogroll is SO not a big deal. Indulge me anyway.

Oh, and help me resist the urge to start chanting "We accept you! One of us!" because I know bloggers are trying to shed the "freaks" image the mainstream media has pinned on us - and not embrace it and live it out in all its intense, Tod Browning glory.

So Kerry On, freaks you guys. Our numbers are growing - and getting taller.

This just in - JK will be appearing on MSNBC'sHardball with Chris Matthews today at 5 pm EST. Blogger, senator, and TV star in the same day? That's what I call skills.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Broadband as beachfront property, and other clever metaphors.

It's been a while since we've had an an op-ed from our favorite senator, no?

This one, from The Hill, was totally worth the wait:

Broadband should be in every home
By Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.)
June 13, 2007

A very important piece of public property is about to be auctioned off. You won’t find it on a map, but it is prime real estate. And the sale of this property has profound implications for schools, businesses, emergency first responders, rural communities and the future of wireless communication and innovation in America.

In the upcoming 700 MHz spectrum auction, the Federal Communications Commission will auction off an important slice of our airwaves. The FCC has a choice: It can either provide extraordinary benefits to millions of Americans or tilt bandwidth policy to line the pockets of a privileged few.

The airwaves belong to the American people — and their use should serve the public interest, not corporate interests. In recent auctions, the big communications companies actively used their bidding power to shut out new providers. As a result, these new companies faced near impossible barriers to entry in the wireless communications industry. What does this mean for us? Consumers don’t enjoy the lower prices and better service that would result from more choice in the communications marketplace.

The upcoming auction presents a real opportunity to promote economic competitiveness and address affordability and availability of important wireless services.

The spectrum being auctioned — the 700 MHz spectrum — really is prime real estate. Some have called it “beachfront property.” This spectrum, currently used for television broadcast signals, can transmit signals through trees, buildings and other structures. It is being auctioned off because television is going digital in 2009. Digital signals will take up less space than the analog being used today, leaving new frequencies available. These are powerful signals, and the devices operating in this spectrum band will be attractive for other consumer uses.

Today, from rural areas to big cities, more than 60 percent of the country does not subscribe to broadband service — many because they do not have access to broadband Internet service or simply cannot afford it. Last year in Massachusetts — a state known for being a nationwide leader in technological advances — less than half our residents had broadband service — and that was the fourth-best rate in the country.

From drafting “white spaces” legislation to supporting municipal broadband, I have advanced and supported a list of measures designed to increase broadband penetration levels so more people in more parts of the country can access these services. This auction provides another unique opportunity to advance the cause.

The FCC must establish auction rules that maximize the likelihood of innovation and ease competitive entry. We must seek the broadest level of participation in the auction, to promote new broadband competition and enable entrepreneurs to provide affordable, competitive high-speed wireless broadband services. In addition, the FCC must consider strict buildout requirements that compel auction winners — in a reasonable time frame — to offer services using this spectrum. Allowing the big companies to scoop up the spectrum and sit on it is not acceptable.

Using the public’s bandwidth to serve the public interest also means paying attention to another long-neglected area of communications policy: public safety and emergency communications. The 9/11 Commission cited grave inadequacies in our emergency communication systems. On that day, our firemen and women, police, and emergency workers could not communicate as the crisis unfolded. The safety of our first responders must be a top priority. The auction is a major opportunity for the FCC to advance these unmet needs.

The Internet and our airwaves are public property. All Americans should benefit from and be able to access it — not just in revenues the government earns from selling spectrum to corporations, but also in expanded access to revolutionary new technology for every American.
Our economy, our schools, our families and our first responders are counting on the FCC and conduct a fair auction in the spirit of competition and innovation that drives the Internet today. Previous generations ushered in new eras of economic progress with electricity for rural areas and a car in every driveway. In 2007 to stay competitive, we should strive to do the same with broadband in every home.

Monday, June 11, 2007

Greening the gleaming white city on the Potomac?

This is an exciting story, and it would be even if my favorite senator's name wasn't on the bill. (But then, I'm eating hemp granola for breakfast. So that just goes to show how I feel about these things.)

Lawmakers Want Capitol to Go Green

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: June 11, 2007

Filed at 3:33 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress says it is going to join the war against global warming by cleaning up its own backyard, now cluttered with a coal-burning power plant, a fleet of fuel-inefficient vehicles and old-fashioned lights.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has set a goal of making House operations carbon neutral during this session of Congress, meaning the House would remove as much carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as it adds by the end of next year.

''The House must lead by example and it is time for Congress to act on its own carbon footprint,'' Pelosi said in announcing the initiative that would also shift the House to 100 percent renewable electric power.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., has sponsored legislation with the long-term aim of making the entire Capitol complex, 23 buildings where some 15,000 people work, carbon neutral by 2020.

Currently the Capitol complex, which includes office buildings, the Library of Congress, the Botanic Garden and the Government Printing Office, accounts for about 316,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions a year, the same as 57,455 cars.

About one-third of that comes from the combustion of fossil fuels at the 97-year-old Capitol Power Plant, the only coal-burning facility in the District of Columbia.

In addition, the Government Accountability Office said in a recent report, there is not one hybrid-electric vehicle in the legislative branch fleet of more than 300 vehicles. The fleet, mostly light-duty trucks, has only 35 vehicles that use alternative fuels, although the Architect's Office has ordered that almost all newly acquired vehicles be alternative-fuel compatible.

House workers have taken the immediate step of converting 2,000 desk lamps to more efficient compact fluorescent lamps. Within six months the remaining 10,000 desk lamps will switch to CFLs, saving the House $245,000 a year in electric power costs.

House Chief Administrative Officer Daniel Beard, in a report to Pelosi, said the House side of the Capitol, which includes four large office buildings, was responsible for 91,000 tons of greenhouse gas in the fiscal year ending last September, equivalent to annual carbon dioxide emissions of 17,200 cars.

The largest source of carbon dioxide comes from the purchase of electricity. Beard said his office, working with the Architect of the Capitol, will strive to meet all electricity needs, about 103,000 megawatt-hours per year, with renewable sources. Currently, more than half the electricity Congress buys is generated by coal. Only 2 percent comes from renewable fuels.

That alone, Beard said, would eliminate 57,000 tons a year of greenhouse gas emissions, the same as removing 11,000 cars from the roads. Another 7,130 tons would be saved with plans to convert overhead ceiling lights with high-efficiency lighting and controls.

He said these steps, and others including buying energy-efficient computers and furnishings containing recycled products and installing an Ethanol-85 tank for congressional vehicles, would still leave them about 34,000 tons short of meeting the carbon neutrality goal. This could be dealt with either by buying offset credits in the domestic market or contributing a per ton payment to a ''green revolving fund'' where revenues received from various sources are used for energy and water conservation initiatives.

On the Senate side, Rules and Administration Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has outlined a plan to audit energy use in all Senate buildings and reduce energy consumption by 30 percent by 2015 by installing high-efficiency lighting and buying renewable energy supplies.

All these efforts, said Anthony Kreindler, spokesman for Environmental Defense, are ''meaningful not only for what they are doing for the Capitol, but it does set a good example for the rest of the country.''

The biggest challenge remains the Capitol Power Plant, an eyesore located four blocks south of the Capitol. The plant hasn't generated power since 1952, but it does provide steam for heating and cooling.

The plant's boilers are fired using coal for 49 percent of their output and natural gas for 47 percent. While the plant is a fairly small source of air pollutants, it is still the District's third-biggest polluter, after two local power company plants.

''In the shadow of the nation's capital, we should expect more than a dirty power plant that pollutes the air and our community,'' Kerry said in a statement.

Lawmakers, dealing with the over-budget, still-unfinished $600 million Capitol Visitor Center, are in no mood to spend money on a new plant, and proposals to eliminate coal have been resisted by coal-state Sens. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., and Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

''With the emergence of new clean coal technologies, I believe coal should play a role in meeting the energy needs of the Capitol complex,'' Byrd said.

A proposed House spending bill for 2008 sets aside $3.9 million to begin replacing coal with greater use of natural gas. The Senate, in a nod to Byrd and McConnell, is backing a $3 million plan by Senate Environment Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., for a project that reduces carbon dioxide when coal is burned at the plant.